## Notes on posting to the arXiv

The U C Davis portal to the arXiv has a page of instructions for the posting process; but I have prepared these more informal notes, based on my experience, to tell you what to have ready, and what to expect, when you post.

### A.  Background and generalities.

• The arXiv is a publicly readable online repository of preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and related fields.
• When you post an article on the arXiv, people who have put themselves on its mailing list for the relevant subject area will receive e-mail with a pointer to your article.  Articles posted in the past can be found by searches of the arXiv website.
• After posting an article, if you produce a revised version, you may post it as a replacement for your article.  The replacement then becomes the default version; but the arXiv still shows that there exists an earlier version, and it remains accessible.  (Replacement posting is done by a different procedure from the original posting.  If you use the first-posting procedure, the two versions will appear as distinct articles, which is considered a misuse of the arXiv.)  You can also withdraw an article you have posted; it will then be marked as "withdrawn", but will still be available to anyone who wishes to access it.
• The very first time you post, the arXiv may require you to be endorsed by someone who has previously posted in the the subject area in question.  This procedure was introduced in January 2004 (I would guess because of crank postings).  Their web page on the subject is vague on who is required to get an endorsement; it may depend on whether you are sending from an academic Department site.  Based on the experience of a student of mine (in Dec. 2006), after entering your data on the submission webpage for the first time, you may be sent an e-mail, which you are to forward to someone who can endorse you.  The e-mail contains a URL and a password that the person will use in doing this.
• The arXiv prefers that we submit articles as TeX source files.  They process these and make available PostScript, PDF, and DVI versions, as well as the source file.  Material added to that file by the arXiv software causes the output to display, in the left-hand margin of the first page (at right angles to the text) the arXiv reference number of the paper, its arXiv subject classification, and the date of submission.
• Though TeX files are preferred, submission in some other formats (currently, PostScript or PDF) is also permitted.  I haven't made such submissions, so the notes below are based on my experience with TeX files.  A link to the arXiv's instructions on non-TeX submissions is included at the bottom of this page.
• Articles that have been submitted are processed at 20:00 Greenwich Mean Time (= 15:00 Eastern Standard Time = 12:00 Pacific Standard Time) each weekday.  If you have submitted a paper, then up to that deadline, you can withdraw it or make changes without the original version appearing.  The articles appear online at 00:00 Greenwich Mean Time the next day, unless a weekend intervenes, in which case they are delayed till 00:00 Greenwich Mean Time the following Tuesday (= Monday afternoon or evening in the US).
• The procedures of the arXiv change from time to time.  These notes were last updated when I arXive'd a new preprint in June 2012, but I may not have noticed all the changes since I last revised them.  If you find that something I say below is not currently accurate, or is unclear, or incomplete, please e-mail me:   .

### B.  Registering on the arXiv.

To register on the arXiv for the first time, go the the UC Davis arXiv portal.  Click "Register" in the upper right, and on the resulting page, click "First Time".  You will then be asked for your e-mail address, for a username, and for a password (which has to contain at least one nonalphabetic character).  On the next page, you will be asked for your name, organization, country, status (student, faculty, etc.), the archives that you will want to submit to (see next paragraph), a default choice among these, and your homepage URL.  After you click on "Submit", the arXiv will send you e-mail with a verification code with which to complete the process.

As of June 2012, the choices of archive are (and have been since at least July 2010):  "Computer Science", "Mathematics", "Nonlinear Sciences", "Physics", "Quantitative Biology", "Quantitative Finance" and "Statistics".

### C.  Preparing to post an article.

I recommend drafting in advance the data you will need to fill in on the arXiv website; you can then simply cut and paste it in during the submission process.  The following is the template I use (modified to remove some features specific to myself).  The first item, the date of submission, is just for my records, and the last, the ArXiv URL, is not something that I prepare in advance, but that the arXiv site provides by e-mail the next day.  The others are for cutting-and-pasting.  After showing the template, I will explain some of the categories, then show the filled-in template for one of my preprints.
Date of Submission:
Archive and Subject Class:
Title:
Author:
Abstract:
Journal-Ref:
Report-no:
DOI:
ACM Class:
MSC-class:
Cross-listing:
ArXiv URL:


Explanations:

The choices for Archive are as listed above (Computer Science, Mathematics, etc.).  The choices for Subject Class are given by a drop-down menu.  This page contains detailed descriptions of the Subject Classes offered by the Mathematics archive.  (The drop-down menu will just show their titles, e.g., "Number Theory", while when the item is posted, the abbreviation, e.g., math.NT for "Archive: Mathematics; Subject class: number theory", will appear.)  Your choice of subject class may be altered by the arXiv staff before your posting appears.  (For instance, not seeing any "universal algebra" classification, I classified one of my papers as "General Mathematics"; but they moved it to "Rings and algebras".  Since then, they have made it clear, as it was not at the time, that "Rings and algebras" includes universal algebra.)

The File(s) to upload will include at least your TeX source file(s).  If those call on a particular journal's style class, the style class file needs to be loaded as well; if you have a separate bibliography file, it should also be.  You will specify these files to the arXiv using the "Browse" feature provided there, uploading them one by one.

In your Abstract, mathematical symbols placed between dollar-signs will be interpreted as in TeX by the program MathJax.  This feature was added late in 2013, and I don't have too much experience with it.  Certainly you should remember that it won't be able to handle macros that you have defined if you don't include the TeX definitions.  It also doesn't treat material not between dollar signs as TeX does, so, for instance, a "~" intended to keep two words on the same line will simply appear as "~".  I also find that it doesn't understand "\nolinebreak" within mathematical formulas.  I haven't posted any recent article whose title contained mathematical symbols, so I don't know whether MathJax would be applied to these as well.

As the text for my abstract, I take a copy of the abstract I have used in the paper, and modify it as seems appropriate in view of the facts that:  (i) the reader will not be able to glance from the abstract to the paper,  (ii) the arXiv limits abstracts to 1920 characters, (iii) I consider the arXiv a slightly less formal medium than a journal, so I will sometimes describe ideas more intuitively than in the paper itself, and (iv) as noted above, MathJax isn't quite the same as TeX.

I have had difficulties with the 1920-character limit -- abstracts which according to the unix "wc" command are well below that limit have been rejected by the software as exceeding it.  I find that joining many short lines into fewer long lines, even though it should not logically decrease the character-count (it should simply replace a number of newline characters with an equal number of whitespace characters) can lead to acceptance of an abstract that was previously rejected.  I also don't know how the character-limit will interact with MathJax -- e.g., how many characters will $\mathbbb{Z}$ be counted as?

Comments can include indications of the length, the nature of changes from a previous version, information on where a paper will appear (if known), etc..

Since my preprints don't appear as institutional reports, I leave Report-no blank.  Journal-Ref and DOI (Digital Object Identifier) are for items that have appeared in print, so one leaves these blank when posting a preprint (even one that is "to appear").  ACM Classes are areas in computer science.  (I suppose that articles in mathematics related to algorithms etc. could also be assigned such classifications; but this is an optional category, and so far I have left it blank.)

The MSC-class(es) should be one or more categories from the Mathematics Subject Classification (used by Math Reviews and Zentralblatt).  The field for inserting MSC-classes doesn't ask separately for Primary and Secondary classifications, but the arXiv recommends the use of these.

At the end of the submission process, they display your submission, including the arXiv Subject Class, and give you the opportunity of adding one or more "cross-listings", which are like secondary subject classifications, but using arXiv categories.  Again this is done with a dropdown menu.  (When you do this you are required to specify the archive as well as the subject, so I suppose that if you are registered in more than one archive, you could cross-list an article you are posting on one archive in a different one.)  You only get a chance to add one cross-listing at a time; but once you submit the meta-data with one cross-listing, the resulting page allows you to add another, and so on.

Here, now, is an example of the above suggested submission template (with first and last line filled in after the fact, and TeX code introduced anachronistically into the abstract, although at the date shown, it was not allowed.):

Date of submission: 1 July, 2010
Archive and Subject Class: Mathematics; Rings and Algebras (Math.RA)
Title: Continuity of homomorphisms on pro-nilpotent algebras
Author: George M. Bergman (U.C.Berkeley)
Abstract:
Let $\mathbf{V}$ be a variety of not necessarily associative algebras,
and $A$ an inverse limit of nilpotent algebras $A_i\in\mathbf{V}$, such
that some finitely generated subalgebra $S\subseteq A$ is dense in $A$
under the inverse limit of the discrete topologies on the $A_i$.

A sufficient condition on $\mathbf{V}$ is obtained for all algebra
homomorphisms from $A$ to finite-dimensional algebras $B$ to be
continuous; in other words, for the kernels of all such homomorphisms
to be open ideals.  This condition is satisfied, in particular, if
$\mathbf{V}$ is the variety of associative, Lie, or Jordan algebras.

Examples are given showing the need for our hypotheses, and some open
questions are noted.
Comments: 12 pages.  Copy at http://math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/papers
may be updated more frequently than arXiv copy.
Journal-Ref:
Report-no:
DOI:
ACM Class:
MSC-class: 17A01 (Primary), 18A30, 49S10 (Secondary)
Cross-listing: General Topology (Math.NG)
ArXiv URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0223


Log in at  http://arxiv.org/submit , using the username and password that you chose when you registered.  (URLs from which you can perform other functions, such as submitting a revised version of an article, are listed at the end of this page.)

On that page, you will fill in fields verifying your contact information, choosing a licensing agreement (they suggest which one to use unless you are fully familiar with some of the more innotative arrangements), and accepting their policy statement on posting.  You are then asked to choose via dropdown menus which archive you will be submitting to (the choices are the archives for which you are registered, e.g., in my case, only Mathematics), and the arXiv subject classification of your paper.  When you have entered this information, click on "Continue".

On the next page you upload the file(s) of your paper, by "browsing" your directory.  Click on the box "Upload file" when you have chosen the desired file.  When you have done so, you will get another copy of the same page, showing what file(s) you have uploaded, and allowing you to upload another if you wish; and so on until you are ready to "Continue".

(You are also given the option of participating in the Data Conservancy Pilot Project, involving "large data sets, imagery, simulations, videos or other material associated with your submission, which exceeds the regular size limits imposed by arXiv".  I haven't had such material, and so have no experience with this.)

You then click "Continue, Process Files", getting a page with a button allowing you to "View" the result.  (Below this on the page, assuming you have submitted a TeX file, are the mass of messages TeX sent as it processed your paper twice, which it is usually safe to ignore.)  I have been happy to find the results, as viewed, essentially identical to what my own TeXing gave.  (The most obvious difference is the presence of arXiv information printed vertically in the left-hand margin of the first page.  A smaller difference is that the on-screen output contains colored links, which allow one to click on an internal cross-reference and get to the to point it refers to, something the version of TeX that I otherwise use does not provide.)

The next page is for "Metadata":  title, author(s), the text of your abstract, etc., through MSC subject classifications, as listed in the template shown above.  You then click on "Save and Continue".

(As of October 2013, I have been having a problem with abstracts being rejected as too long -- I click on "Save and Continue", and get a copy of the same Metadata page, but starting with a complaint that the abstract cannot be longer than 1,920 characters.  To get the abstract accepted, I find I have to cut it down not just to 1,920 characters, but to something under about 1,850, and join lines, so that their 180-character-wide screen shows few long lines, rather than many short ones.  I've written them about this.  Shall indicate what their response is when I get it.)

The final page, "Preview", shows a formatted version of this metadata.  If something has come out wrong, you can go back to the preceding page and fix it.  (E.g., on one occasion I found that in copying my abstract, I had left in some symbols based on TeX definitions in my paper, which MathJax couldn't process, so I replaced them with similar standard symbols; and I also had a "~" in "von~Neumann", which MathJax didn't process as TeX would have, since it was not a mathmode symbol; so I replaced the tilde with whitespace.)  At the bottom, after showing the archive and subject you have chosen for the article, it allows you to cross-list to additional archives and/or subjects.  This page also allows you to "View Article" if you did not already do so, and, finally, to "Submit Article", completing the process.

Immediately after posting, you will get e-mail from the arXiv confirming your posting, and giving you a password to use in any future changes involving the posted paper.

### E.  Links to some arXiv pages

• Main site and list of mirror sites
• UC Davis arXiv portal, including information on submitting papers to the arXiv.
• Page from which to submit papers.
• Page from which to modify material you have on the arXiv: replace a paper with a revised version, withdraw a paper, cross list a paper, add a journal reference, or annotate a paper.
• General information on the submission process.
• ArXiv classification scheme for mathematics papers.
• Page from which to add a journal reference, a DOI, or a report number to the arXiv record.
• Information on submitting papers in formats other than TeX (currently, PostScript or PDF).