Contents:
A.  Background and generalities.
B.  Registering on the arXiv.
C.  Preparing to post an article.
D.  Posting your article.
E.  Links to some arXiv pages.

• The arXiv is a publicly readable online repository of preprints and other notes in physics, mathematics, and related fields. 
• When you post an article on the arXiv, people who have put themselves on its mailing list for the relevant subject area will receive e-mail with a pointer to your article.  Articles posted in the past can be found by searches of the arXiv website. 
• After posting an article, if you produce a revised version, you may post it as a replacement for your article.  The replacement then becomes the default version; but the arXiv still shows that there exists an earlier version, and it remains accessible.  (Replacement posting is done by a different procedure from the original posting.  If you repeat the first-posting procedure, the two versions will appear as distinct articles, which is considered a misuse of the arXiv.)  You can also withdraw an article you have posted; it will then be marked as "withdrawn", but will still be available to anyone who wishes to access it. 
• The very first time you post, the arXiv requires you to be endorsed by someone who has previously posted in the the subject area in question.  This procedure was introduced in January 2004 (I would guess because of crank postings).  See their web page on endorsement.
• The arXiv prefers that we submit articles as TeX source files.  They process these and make available PostScript, PDF, and DVI versions, as well as the source file.  Material added to that file by the arXiv software causes the output to display, in the left-hand margin of the first page (at right angles to the text) the arXiv reference number of the paper, its arXiv subject classification, and the date of submission. 
• Though TeX files are preferred, submission in some other formats (currently, PostScript or PDF) is also permitted.  I haven't made such submissions, so the notes below are based on my experience with TeX files.  A link to the arXiv's instructions on non-TeX submissions is included at the bottom of this page. 
• Articles that have been submitted are processed at 20:00 Greenwich Mean Time (= 15:00 Eastern Standard Time = 12:00 Pacific Standard Time) each weekday.  If you have submitted a paper, then up to that deadline, you can withdraw it or make changes without the original version appearing.  The articles appear online at 00:00 Greenwich Mean Time the next day, unless a weekend intervenes, in which case they are delayed till 00:00 Greenwich Mean Time the following Tuesday (= Monday afternoon or evening in the US).
• The procedures of the arXiv change from time to time.  These notes were last updated when I arXive'd a new preprint in June 2012, but I may not have noticed all the changes since I last revised them.  If you find that something I say below is not currently accurate, or is unclear, or incomplete, please e-mail me:   .   

As of June 2012, the choices of archive are (and have been since at least July 2010):  "Computer Science", "Mathematics", "Nonlinear Sciences", "Physics", "Quantitative Biology", "Quantitative Finance" and "Statistics". 

C.  Preparing to post an article.

Date of Submission:
Archive and Subject Class:
File(s) to upload:
Title:
Author:
Abstract:
Comments:
Journal-Ref:
Report-no:
DOI:
ACM Class:
MSC-class:
Cross-listing:
ArXiv URL:

Explanations: 

The choices for Archive are as listed above (Computer Science, Mathematics, etc.).  The choices for Subject Class are given by a drop-down menu.  This page contains detailed descriptions of the Subject Classes offered by the Mathematics archive.  (The drop-down menu will just show their titles, e.g., "Number Theory", while when the item is posted, the abbreviation, e.g., math.NT for "Archive: Mathematics; Subject class: number theory", will appear.)  Your choice of subject class may be altered by the arXiv staff before your posting appears.  (For instance, not seeing any "universal algebra" classification, I classified one of my papers as "General Mathematics"; but they moved it to "Rings and algebras".  Since then, they have made it clear, as it was not at the time, that "Rings and algebras" includes universal algebra.) 

The File(s) to upload will include at least your TeX source file(s).  If those call on a particular journal's style class, the style class file needs to be loaded as well; if you have a separate bibliography file, it should also be.  You will specify these files to the arXiv using the "Browse" feature provided there, uploading them one by one. 

In your Abstract, mathematical symbols placed between dollar-signs will be interpreted as in TeX by the program MathJax.  This feature was added late in 2013, and I don't have too much experience with it.  Certainly you should remember that it won't be able to handle macros that you have defined if you don't include the TeX definitions.  It also doesn't treat material not between dollar signs as TeX does, so, for instance, a "~" intended to keep two words on the same line will simply appear as "~".  I also find that it doesn't understand "\nolinebreak" within mathematical formulas.  I haven't posted any recent article whose title contained mathematical symbols, so I don't know whether MathJax would be applied to these as well. 

As the text for my abstract, I take a copy of the abstract I have used in the paper, and modify it as seems appropriate in view of the facts that:  (i) the reader will not be able to glance from the abstract to the paper,  (ii) the arXiv limits abstracts to 1920 characters, (iii) I consider the arXiv a slightly less formal medium than a journal, so I will sometimes describe ideas more intuitively than in the paper itself, and (iv) as noted above, MathJax isn't quite the same as TeX.  

I have had difficulties with the 1920-character limit -- abstracts which according to the unix "wc" command are well below that limit have been rejected by the software as exceeding it.  I find that joining many short lines into fewer long lines, even though it should not logically decrease the character-count (it should simply replace a number of newline characters with an equal number of whitespace characters) can lead to acceptance of an abstract that was previously rejected.  I also don't know how the character-limit will interact with MathJax -- e.g., how many characters will $\mathbbb{Z}$ be counted as?

Comments can include indications of the length, the nature of changes from a previous version, information on where a paper will appear (if known), etc.. 

Since my preprints don't appear as institutional reports, I leave Report-no blank.  Journal-Ref and DOI (Digital Object Identifier) are for items that have appeared in print, so one leaves these blank when posting a preprint (even one that is "to appear").  ACM Classes are areas in computer science.  (I suppose that articles in mathematics related to algorithms etc. could also be assigned such classifications; but this is an optional category, and so far I have left it blank.) 

The MSC-class(es) should be one or more categories from the Mathematics Subject Classification (used by Math Reviews and Zentralblatt).  The field for inserting MSC-classes doesn't ask separately for Primary and Secondary classifications, but the arXiv recommends the use of these. 

At the end of the submission process, they display your submission, including the arXiv Subject Class, and give you the opportunity of adding one or more "cross-listings", which are like secondary subject classifications, but using arXiv categories.  Again this is done with a dropdown menu.  (When you do this you are required to specify the archive as well as the subject, so I suppose that if you are registered in more than one archive, you could cross-list an article you are posting on one archive in a different one.)  You only get a chance to add one cross-listing at a time; but once you submit the meta-data with one cross-listing, the resulting page allows you to add another, and so on. 

Here, now, is an example of the above suggested submission template (with first and last line filled in after the fact, and TeX code introduced anachronistically into the abstract, although at the date shown, it was not allowed.):

Date of submission: 1 July, 2010
Archive and Subject Class: Mathematics; Rings and Algebras (Math.RA)
File to upload:  /home/u1/fac/gbergman/public_html/papers/pro-np2.tex
Title: Continuity of homomorphisms on pro-nilpotent algebras
Author: George M. Bergman
Abstract:
 Let $\mathbf{V}$ be a variety of not necessarily associative algebras,
 and $A$ an inverse limit of nilpotent algebras $A_i\in\mathbf{V}$, such
 that some finitely generated subalgebra $S\subseteq A$ is dense in $A$
 under the inverse limit of the discrete topologies on the $A_i$.
 <p>
 A sufficient condition on $\mathbf{V}$ is obtained for all algebra
 homomorphisms from $A$ to finite-dimensional algebras $B$ to be
 continuous; in other words, for the kernels of all such homomorphisms
 to be open ideals.  This condition is satisfied, in particular, if
 $\mathbf{V}$ is the variety of associative, Lie, or Jordan algebras.
 <p>
 Examples are given showing the need for our hypotheses, and some open
 questions are noted.
Comments: 12 pages.  Copy at /~gbergman/papers
 may be updated more frequently than arXiv copy.
Journal-Ref:
Report-no:
DOI:
ACM Class:
MSC-class: 17A01 (Primary), 18A30, 49S10 (Secondary)
Cross-listing: General Topology (Math.NG)
ArXiv URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0223

Log in at  http://arxiv.org/submit , using the username and password that you chose when you registered.  (URLs from which you can perform other functions, such as submitting a revised version of an article, are listed at the end of this page.) 

On that page, you will fill in fields verifying your contact information, choosing a licensing agreement and accepting their policy statement on posting.  You are then asked to choose via dropdown menus which archive you will be submitting to (the choices are the archives for which you are registered, e.g., in my case, only Mathematics), and the arXiv subject classification of your paper.  When you have entered this information, click on "Continue". 

On the next page you upload the file(s) of your paper, by "browsing" your directory.  Click on the box "Upload file" when you have chosen the desired file.  When you have done so, you will get another copy of the same page, showing what file(s) you have uploaded, and allowing you to upload another if you wish; and so on until you are ready to "Continue". 

You then click "Continue, Process Files", getting a page with a button allowing you to "View" the result.  (Below this on the page, assuming you have submitted a TeX file, are the mass of messages TeX sent as it processed your paper twice, which it is usually safe to ignore.)  I have been happy to find the results, as viewed, essentially identical to what my own TeXing gave.  (The most obvious difference is the presence of arXiv information printed vertically in the left-hand margin of the first page.  A smaller difference is that the on-screen output contains colored links, which allow one to click on an internal cross-reference and get to the to point it refers to, something the version of TeX that I otherwise use does not provide.)  After verifying this, use the "Back" feature of your browser to return to the "View" page, and again click on "Continue".

(November 2020 note:  I just uploaded a new paper, and the arXiv setup seems to have been modified so that the "mass of messages" referred to above now appears with lines that indicate potential problems highlighted in color.  The highlighted "not found" messages regarding crossreferences etc. that appear in the first TeXing can, of course, be ignored; these messages no longer appear in the second TeXing if the crossreferencing was correct.  Another kind of message that showed up regarding the paper I just submitted concerned a "forbidden character" (I forget the exact wording) at many line-numbers. These turned out to be the blank line in my input file following each new "\section" heading.  These did not disappear on re-TeXing, and the arXiv even ran a third TeXing, and they never disappeared. However, viewing their processed file, I found nothing wrong at those places.)

The next page is for "Metadata":  title, author(s), the text of your abstract, etc., through MSC subject classifications, as listed in the template shown above.  You then click on "Save and Continue". 

The final page, "Preview", shows a formatted version of this metadata.  If something has come out wrong, you can go back to the preceding page and fix it.  (E.g., on one occasion I found that in copying my abstract, I had left in some symbols based on TeX definitions in my paper, which MathJax couldn't process, so I replaced them with similar standard symbols; and I also had a "~" in "von~Neumann", which MathJax didn't process as TeX would have, since it was not a mathmode symbol; so I replaced the tilde with whitespace.)  At the bottom, after showing the archive and subject you have chosen for the article, it allows you to cross-list to additional archives and/or subjects.  This page also allows you to "View Article" if you did not already do so, and, finally, to "Submit Article", completing the process. 

Immediately after posting, you will get e-mail from the arXiv confirming your posting, and giving you a password to use in any future changes involving the posted paper. 

E.  Links to some arXiv pages