Related to the previous post, I have been thinking about when, given submanifolds
For this, we may as well cut out neighborhoods of
Theorem. Let
Proof. More precisely, let’s write
Let
Sheaf quantization acts as the identity on the category of local systems; in particular, preserving
where the second to last step is due to the fact that sheaf quantization is an equivalence of categories.
Thus the inclusion
E.g. invoking Smale’s h-cobordism theorem, I learn that any manifold both of whose ends are simply connected of dimension
But really one wants to upgrade the conclusion of the above theorem to the statement that
[Indeed, this statement can possibly be deduced from some version of what is currently known about the nearby Lagrangian conjecture: take the movie of the isotopy and turn it into an exact (?) Lagrangian. One should worry a bit about this being the noncompact setting, about Maslov classes, and also about the fact that at least if I allow the isotopy to close back up, e.g. the isotopy from the cocircle over the north pole on the sphere to the cocircle over south pole on the sphere, followed by the trivial isotopy back to the north pole, then the movie certainly cannot be made exact — the movie’s a klein bottle; this would violate known statements re. NLC. Possibly one is saved in this setting by the fact that the isotopy doesn’t close.]
Remark. At least the case of sphere boundaries isn’t really saying anything interesting. Indeed, suppose given such an isotopy in the conormal bundle, one has a degree one map relative the boundaries from a cylinder to the base; by capping off, one has a degree 1 map from a sphere to the capped off base, hence the capped of base is a sphere, hence once you remove the caps it’s a cylinder. Maybe this isn’t saying anything interesting in general. I.e.,
Q: suppose one has a cobordism in which the two ends are homotopic. Must it be an h-cobordism?
Hi Vivek,
Here are some related questions about Legendrian ? Or in the complement of some other singular Legendrian ? Is there any sheafy way to do so?
1. How to test if two Legendrians are isotopic in
2. If one view a constructible sheaf as a functor from to chain complexes, by , can one replace the category of open sets by some other category of test objects? Here the category of open sets are viewed as a full subcategory of with objects of costandard objects on these open sets. I am interested in the vague question as ‘How many test objects do you need to fully know a constructible sheaf’.