F-fields

Definition.  Fix a prime p.  Let M be a manifold.  An F-field on M is a locally constant sheaf of perfect rings of characteristic p.

Each element of H1(M,Z) determines an isomorphism class of F-fields.  The F-field f corresponding to the cocycle z has one fiber that is Fp, and each loop in M acts on that fiber by taking pnth powers, where n is the degree of z over the loop.  One could replace Fp by any other perfect ring.

The name is stupid.  It reflects my probably misguided hope that these things are similar to B-fields.

If M is a symplectic manifold carrying an F-field f, it is interesting to consider Lagrangian submanifolds decorated with locally constant sheaves of modules over f|L.  If M=TX, then f descends to an F-field on X, let’s keep on denoting it by f, and it is interesting to consider constructible sheaves of modules over f on X.

Example.  If f is a nontrivial F-field on a circle, whose fiber is an algebraic closure of Fp, its global sections are a finite field Fq.  (While the global cohomology of f vanishes in nonzero degrees.)  The category of locally constant sheaves of modules over f is equivalent to the category of Fq-vector spaces, again by taking global sections.

One can also put it this way: the data of a locally constant sheaf L of f-modules is equivalent to the data of a fiber Lx=:V, together with a fx-semilinear (Frobenius-linear) monodromy map VV, i.e. it gives an Fq-rational structure on the fiber.

Example.  The usual rational structure on the character variety of Σ over Fp can be twisted by a mapping class ϕ.  The Fq-points of this rational structure correspond to locally constant sheaves of f-modules over the mapping torus of ϕ,  where f is pulled back from the F-field on the circle given in the previous example.

Example.  Let f be a nontrivial F-field on an annulus, and on its cotangent bundle.  Let Φ be the front projection of the closure of a positive braid, say b, and let Λ be its Legendrian lift.  Then M1(Λ,f) is the set of closed points of a generalized Deligne-Lusztig variety DL(b) defined over fx.  Here fx is the fiber of the F-field above a point in the top region of Φ.

For instance, if Φ is the closure of a single crossing, then M1(Λ,f)[(P1(fx)P1(Fq))/GL2(Fq)], i.e. a line in V:=fx2 that is not equal to its Frobenius-conjugate.

DLvariety

Each Deligne-Lusztig variety is equipped with a Galois covering whose Deck group is the Fq-points of a nonsplit torus.  (In case of a single crossing as above, the total space is an affine curve of genus (q2)).  That cover is pulled back from the universal torsor along a map DL(b)BT(Fq).  That has an interpretation here: it’s the microlocal monodromy map M1(Λ,f)Loc1(Λ,f|Λ).

3 comments

  1. Vivek Shende says:

    I note my personal fantasy that this setup will produce a comparison between the deligne-lusztig variety and a wild character variety, leading to a comparison between finite Lie group and rational Cherednik algebra rep theory.

    • David T. says:

      What do you have in mind? I would have said, my third example just is a comparison between DL varieties and wild character varieties.

      • Vivek Shende says:

        Cohomology of DL varieties => unipotent rep theory of GLn(Fq)

        Cohomology of WCV => rep theory of rational GL_n DAHA

        Both are controlled by the q-schur algebra, but no-one really knows why, maybe this is why.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *