Definition. Fix a prime . Let be a manifold. An -field on is a locally constant sheaf of perfect rings of characteristic .
Each element of determines an isomorphism class of -fields. The -field corresponding to the cocycle has one fiber that is , and each loop in acts on that fiber by taking th powers, where is the degree of over the loop. One could replace by any other perfect ring.
The name is stupid. It reflects my probably misguided hope that these things are similar to -fields.
If is a symplectic manifold carrying an -field , it is interesting to consider Lagrangian submanifolds decorated with locally constant sheaves of modules over . If , then descends to an -field on , let’s keep on denoting it by , and it is interesting to consider constructible sheaves of modules over on .
Example. If is a nontrivial -field on a circle, whose fiber is an algebraic closure of , its global sections are a finite field . (While the global cohomology of vanishes in nonzero degrees.) The category of locally constant sheaves of modules over is equivalent to the category of -vector spaces, again by taking global sections.
One can also put it this way: the data of a locally constant sheaf of -modules is equivalent to the data of a fiber , together with a -semilinear (Frobenius-linear) monodromy map , i.e. it gives an -rational structure on the fiber.
Example. The usual rational structure on the character variety of over can be twisted by a mapping class . The -points of this rational structure correspond to locally constant sheaves of -modules over the mapping torus of , where is pulled back from the -field on the circle given in the previous example.
Example. Let be a nontrivial -field on an annulus, and on its cotangent bundle. Let be the front projection of the closure of a positive braid, say , and let be its Legendrian lift. Then is the set of closed points of a generalized Deligne-Lusztig variety defined over . Here is the fiber of the -field above a point in the top region of .
For instance, if is the closure of a single crossing, then , i.e. a line in that is not equal to its Frobenius-conjugate.

Each Deligne-Lusztig variety is equipped with a Galois covering whose Deck group is the -points of a nonsplit torus. (In case of a single crossing as above, the total space is an affine curve of genus ). That cover is pulled back from the universal torsor along a map . That has an interpretation here: it’s the microlocal monodromy map .
I note my personal fantasy that this setup will produce a comparison between the deligne-lusztig variety and a wild character variety, leading to a comparison between finite Lie group and rational Cherednik algebra rep theory.
What do you have in mind? I would have said, my third example just is a comparison between DL varieties and wild character varieties.
Cohomology of DL varieties => unipotent rep theory of GLn(Fq)
Cohomology of WCV => rep theory of rational GL_n DAHA
Both are controlled by the q-schur algebra, but no-one really knows why, maybe this is why.