Prepared by Di-an Jan
First, try to simplify the integrand, in this case, with one of the laws of exponents
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Again, first simplify the integrand
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
There are other ways to do the integral correctly. These all give the same answer after simplifying with laws of logarithms and exponents.
Substitution with
and
![]() |
Integration by parts with
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Integrating by parts don't work the other way because
we don't know the antiderivative of
.
Same as above but integrate
by parts
![]() |
![]() |
Integrating by parts the other way don't work. It gives
![]() |
There are a couple ways to do
The integrand contains a single
and many
, whose derivative is
,
so try the substitution
and
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
Instead, we can take a bigger substitution
without changing its derivative
and
![]() |
Integrate by parts,
with chosen to have the simplest derivative
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Or, we can multiply it out and use the laws of exponents to simplify
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
We can also try integration by parts first,
but it's harder to see how to choose and
without before using substitution to simplify the integral.
For
, we need something we can integrate to
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
To approximate
using Simpson's rule with
,
divide the interval
into
pieces
bounded by the points
,
and
each of size
.
Let
, then the trapezoid rule approximation is
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
To solve the differential equation
,
with initial condition
, use separation of variables.
First, there is a constant solution
,
but that doesn't satisfy the initial condition. Then
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A Euler's method problem should be on the final.
Start at at the given initial value
.
There, the slope
is positive, so
increases.
Thus we move right (the positive direction) along the
-axis,
and we find that the slope
decreases
until it reaches 0 at
.
Thus the solution
starts from
at
with a positive slope,
and concaves up and becomes asymptotic to
.
This is (d).
Start at at the given initial value
.
There, the slope
is negative, so
decreases.
Thus we move left (the negative direction) along the
-axis,
and we find that the slope
increases
(gets closer to 0) until it reaches 0 at
.
Thus the solution
starts from
at
with a negative slope,
and concaves down and becomes asymptotic to
.
This is (b).
Let be the amount of compound A,
then the rate at which A transforms to B is
.
The rate is negative
because the amount of A decreases as it is transformed to B,
but that's okay.
``The rate is proportional to the cube of B,''
and the other conditions translates to
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |