1 (page 161, # 26) Suppose that every member of
has
cardinality at most
, then
.
Define
by
. If
and
are two elements of
with
, then
and
.
As
is injective, we have
as well, so that
. Thus,
is injective showing that
.
Therefore,
.
2 (page 161, # 27)
No. For a positive real number, let
.
Then
is a circle and for
we have
. Set
.
Yes. Recall that we defined a figure eight to be a set of the form
where
and
are circles whose bounded disks meet at exactly one point. For
each pair of positive rational numbers
and
with
, we define
to be the set of figure eights in
whose smaller circle has radius
with
and whose large circle has radius
with
.
Note that
is a countable union of the sets
.
If we show that each
is countable, then we know that
itself is.
Note that if
are two distinct figure eights with the specified
conditions on their radii, then not only are
and
disjoint, but the disks that
they bound are also disjoint as if
were a subset of the union of the disks
bounded by
, we would need the sum of the radii of the circles of
to be
less than the radius of the larger circle of
, but this sum is at least
.
Thus, exactly as in part (a) we may define an injective function
showing that
is countable.
3 (page 161, # 28) Find a set
of open intervals in
such that every rational number belongs to one of those
intervals but
.
Let
.
4 (page 161, # 29) Let be a set of positive real numbers. Assume that there is a bound
such that the sum
of any finite subset of
is less than
. Show that
is countable.
5 (page 161, # 30) Assume that is a set with at least two elements. Show that
.
We break the argument into two cases at this point.
If is finite, then
each of the sets
is also finite and, thus, at most countable. Therefore,
is also at most countable. However, as
, we see that
.
If is infinite, then
where
.
Let
be a bijection and let
be the
induced bijection given by
.
Define a function
by
Then is injective as if
we see that
and that we have
.
Composing with
, we see that
.
6 (page 165, # 32) Let
be the collection of all finite subsets of
. Show that if
is
infinite, then
.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Thus, by problem 26 of page 161, we have that
. However, as
, we certainly have
.
Therefore,
.
Now, define a function
by
.
By definition of a finite set, this function is surjective. Thus,
. Again, as every singleton in
is a finite set, we
have
. Therefore,
.
7 (page 165, # 35) Find a collection
of
sets of natural numbers such that any two
distinct members of
have finite intersection.
Claim: Let be any infinite set with
. Let
.
Then
.
Proof of claim: We may write
as the disjoint union of
and
. By the result of the
previous problem, we have
. Letting
,
We compute
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
By Euclid's theorem, the set of prime numbers is a countably infinite set. Hence, the set
of infinite sets of primes has cardinality
.
For each
define
.
This association defined a function
. Let
.
Note that for any
the set
is infinite as
is infinite so that there are elements of
with arbitrarily many prime divisors.
If are two distinct elements of
, then there is some prime which belongs to one set but not the
other. Without loss of generality, we may assume
. Let
and
. Note that if
, then
does not divide
while
divides every
element of
. Thus,
is contained in
which
is a finite set. Hence,
is finite. As
is infinite, this implies in particular that
. Thus, the map
is a bijection so that
has cardinality
and is almost
disjoint.
8 Show that for any infinite cardinal , we have
.
As every permutation is a function from to
(and in particular a relation with field
), we have
so that
.
For the other inequality, define a function
by
.
Let
. To compute the cardinality of
we need a claim.
Claim: Let be any set with
. Then there is a permutation
having no
fixed points.
Proof of claim: If is finite, then
for some
with
. Let
be a bijection.
Define
by
if
and
. Define
by
.
If is infinite of cardinality
, then as
, we can find a bijection
. Define
by
.
Let
.
From the claim it follows that
.
For if
, then
and if
has more than one element,
then we can find (by the claim) a permutation
having no fixed points so that if
we have
. Finally, if
is a singleton, then
cannot be in the image of
as any permutation which fixes
must fix
its complement setwise, and in the case of a singleton, being fixed setwise is the same as being fixed
pointwise.
There is an obvious bijection between and the set of subsets of
whose complements are singletons
given by
. Hence,
. As in the proof
the claim in problem 7, we conclude that
. As
is surjective, we conclude that
.
Combining this with the other inequality, we conclude that
.