next up previous
Next: About this document ...

Math 135: Solutions to Homework Set #9


1 (page 161, # 26) Suppose that every member of $ {\mathcal A}$ has cardinality at most $ \kappa$, then $ {\rm card}\bigcup {\mathcal A}\leq ({\rm card}{\mathcal A}) \cdot \kappa$.

Proof. Define $ Y := \{ \langle a, x \rangle : x \in a \in {\mathcal A}\}$. Then by definition of the union, the function $ f:Y \to \bigcup A$ defined by $ \langle a, x \rangle \mapsto x $ is surjective. Hence, $ {\mathcal A}\preceq Y$. It suffices to show that $ Y \preceq {\mathcal A}\times \kappa$. Let $ R := \{ \langle a, f \rangle \in A \times (\bigcup A \times \kappa) : f$    is an injective function with domain $ a$    and range contained in $ \kappa \}$. By hypothesis, every $ a \in {\mathcal A}$ has cardinality at most $ \kappa$ so that there is some injective $ f:a \hookrightarrow \kappa$. That is, $ {\rm dom}R = {\mathcal A}$. By the axiom of choice there is a function $ F \subseteq R$ with $ {\rm dom}F = {\rm dom}R = {\mathcal A}$.

Define $ G: Y \to {\mathcal A}\times \kappa$ by $ \langle a, x \rangle \mapsto \langle a, F(a)(x) \rangle$. If $ y = \langle a, x \rangle$ and $ y' = \langle a', x' \rangle$ are two elements of $ Y$ with $ G(y) = G(y')$, then $ a = a'$ and $ F(a)(x) = F(a')(x') = F(a)(x')$. As $ F(a)$ is injective, we have $ x = x'$ as well, so that $ y = y'$. Thus, $ G$ is injective showing that $ Y \preceq {\mathcal A}\times \kappa$.

Therefore, $ {\rm card}\bigcup {\mathcal A}\leq ({\rm card}{\mathcal A}) \cdot \kappa$. $ \qedsymbol$


2 (page 161, # 27)

(a)
Let $ A$ be a collection of circular disks in the plane, no two of which intersect. Show that $ A$ is countable.

Proof. As $ {\mathbb{Q}}^2$ is dense in $ {\mathbb{R}}^2$, if $ D$ is any disk in the plane, then we must have $ D \cap {\mathbb{Q}}^2 \neq {\varnothing}$. Let $ R := \bigcup \{ D \cap {\mathbb{Q}}^2 \vert D \in A \}$. For $ x \in R$, by definition, there is some $ D \in A$ with $ x \in D$. As the disks in $ A$ are disjoint, there can be at most one such $ D$. Define $ G: R \to A$ by $ G := \{ \langle x, D \rangle \in {\mathbb{Q}}^2 \times A \vert x \in D \}$. The above remark shows that $ R$ is a surjective function. Hence, we may find some injective $ f:A \hookrightarrow R$ with $ G \circ f = {\rm id}_A$. As $ R \subseteq {\mathbb{Q}}^2$, we have $ \vert R\vert \leq \aleph_0$. Hence, $ \vert A\vert \leq \vert\aleph_0\vert$. $ \qedsymbol$

(b)
Let $ B$ be a collection of circles in the plane, no two of which intersect. Need $ B$ be countable?

No. For $ r$ a positive real number, let $ S_r := \{ (x,y) \in {\mathbb{R}}^2: x^2 + y^2 = r \}$. Then $ S_r$ is a circle and for $ r \neq s$ we have $ S_r \cap S_s = {\varnothing}$. Set $ C := \{ S_r \vert r \in {\mathbb{R}}, r > 0 \}$.

(c)
Let $ C$ be a collection of figure eights in the plane, no two of which intersect. Need $ C$ be countable?

Yes. Recall that we defined a figure eight to be a set of the form $ X \cup Y$ where $ X$ and $ Y$ are circles whose bounded disks meet at exactly one point. For each pair of positive rational numbers $ p$ and $ q$ with $ p \leq q$, we define $ C_{p,q}$ to be the set of figure eights in $ C$ whose smaller circle has radius $ r$ with $ p \leq r$ and whose large circle has radius $ R$ with $ q \leq R < q + p$. Note that $ C = \bigcup_{p \leq q} C_{p,q}$ is a countable union of the sets $ C_{p,q}$. If we show that each $ C_{p,q}$ is countable, then we know that $ C$ itself is. Note that if $ F, E \in C_{p,q}$ are two distinct figure eights with the specified conditions on their radii, then not only are $ F$ and $ E$ disjoint, but the disks that they bound are also disjoint as if $ F$ were a subset of the union of the disks bounded by $ F$, we would need the sum of the radii of the circles of $ F$ to be less than the radius of the larger circle of $ E$, but this sum is at least $ p + q$. Thus, exactly as in part (a) we may define an injective function $ f:C_{p,q} \to {\mathbb{Q}}^2$ showing that $ C_{p,q}$ is countable.


3 (page 161, # 28) Find a set $ {\mathcal A}$ of open intervals in $ {\mathbb{R}}$ such that every rational number belongs to one of those intervals but $ \bigcup {\mathcal A}\neq {\mathbb{R}}$.

Let $ {\mathcal A}= \{(\sqrt{2} + n, \sqrt{2} + n + 1) : n \in {\mathbb{Z}}\}$.


4 (page 161, # 29) Let $ A$ be a set of positive real numbers. Assume that there is a bound $ b$ such that the sum of any finite subset of $ A$ is less than $ b$. Show that $ A$ is countable.

Proof. For each positive integer $ n$ define $ A_n := A \cap (\frac{1}{n},\infty)$. I claim that for each $ n$, the set $ A_n$ is finite. Suppose this fails for some $ n$. Let $ k \in \omega$ be a natural number for which $ k > n b$. If $ A_n$ were infinite, then we could find $ a_1, \ldots, a_k \in A$ distinct. We have $ b \geq \sum_{i=1}^k a_i > \sum_{i=1}^k \frac{1}{n} = \frac{k}{n} > \frac{nb}{n} = b$.With this contradiction, we see that $ A_n$ is finite. Thus, $ A = \bigcup_{n = 1}^\infty A_n$ being a countable union of at most countable sets is itself at most countable. $ \qedsymbol$


5 (page 161, # 30) Assume that $ A$ is a set with at least two elements. Show that $ {\rm Sq}(A) \preceq {^\omega}A$.

Proof. By definition of $ {\rm Sq}(A)$, we have $ {\rm Sq}(A) = \bigcup_{n \in \omega} {^n}A$.

We break the argument into two cases at this point.

If $ A$ is finite, then each of the sets $ {^n}A$ is also finite and, thus, at most countable. Therefore, $ {\rm Sq}(A)$ is also at most countable. However, as $ 2 \preceq A$, we see that $ {\rm Sq}(A) \preceq \omega \prec {^\omega}2 \preceq {^\omega}A$.

If $ A$ is infinite, then $ A \approx A \cup \{ * \} =: A'$ where $ * \notin A$. Let $ g:A' \to A$ be a bijection and let $ G:{^\omega} A' \to {^\omega}A$ be the induced bijection given by $ \sigma \mapsto g \circ \sigma$.

Define a function $ F:{\rm Sq}(A) \to {^\omega}A'$ by

$\displaystyle F(\sigma)(n) = \begin{cases}\sigma(n) & \text{ if } n \in {\rm dom}\sigma \\
* & \text{ otherwise }
\end{cases} $

Then $ F$ is injective as if $ F(\sigma) = F(\tau)$ we see that $ {\rm dom}(\sigma) =
F(\sigma)^{-1} [[A]] = F(\tau)^{-1} [[A]] {\rm dom}(\tau)$ and that we have $ \sigma = F(\sigma) \upharpoonright {\rm dom}(\sigma) = F(\tau) \upharpoonright
{\rm dom}(\sigma) = F(\tau) \upharpoonright {\rm dom}(\tau) = \tau$.

Composing $ F$ with $ G$, we see that $ {\rm Sq}(A) \preceq {^\omega}A$. $ \qedsymbol$


6 (page 165, # 32) Let $ {\mathcal F}A$ be the collection of all finite subsets of $ A$. Show that if $ A$ is infinite, then $ A \approx {\mathcal F}A$.

Proof. We claim that for $ n \in \omega$ and $ n > 0$ we have $ A \approx {^n}A$. We prove this by induction on $ n$. For $ n = 1$, there is an obvious bijection between $ A$ and $ {^1}A$ given by $ a \mapsto [0 \mapsto a]$. Assuming the result for $ n$, we compute
$\displaystyle { ^{n^+} }A$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle {^{n \cup \{ n \} }}A$  
  $\displaystyle \approx$ $\displaystyle {^n A} \times {^{\{n\}}}A$    by Thm 6I(4)   
  $\displaystyle \approx$ $\displaystyle {^n} A \times A$    by the base case   
  $\displaystyle \approx$ $\displaystyle A \times A$    by IH   
  $\displaystyle \approx$ $\displaystyle A$    by Lemma 6R   

Thus, by problem 26 of page 161, we have that $ \vert{\rm Sq}(A)\vert \leq \aleph_0 \cdot \vert A\vert
= \vert A\vert$. However, as $ {^1}A \subseteq {\rm Sq}(A)$, we certainly have $ \vert A\vert \leq \vert{\rm Sq}(A)\vert$. Therefore, $ A \approx {\rm Sq}(A)$.

Now, define a function $ {\rm Sq}(A) \to {\mathcal F}A$ by $ \sigma \mapsto {\rm rng}\sigma$. By definition of a finite set, this function is surjective. Thus, $ \vert{\mathcal F}A\vert \leq
\vert{\rm Sq}(A)\vert = \vert A\vert$. Again, as every singleton in $ A$ is a finite set, we have $ \vert A\vert \leq \vert{\mathcal F}A\vert$. Therefore, $ A \approx {\mathcal F}A$. $ \qedsymbol$


7 (page 165, # 35) Find a collection $ {\mathcal A}$ of $ 2^{\aleph_0}$ sets of natural numbers such that any two distinct members of $ {\mathcal A}$ have finite intersection.

Proof. We prove a claim.

Claim: Let $ K$ be any infinite set with $ {\rm card}K = \kappa$. Let $ {\mathcal I}K := \{ X \in {\mathcal P}K \ \vert \ \vert X\vert \geq \aleph_0 \}$. Then $ \vert{\mathcal I}K\vert = 2^\kappa$.

Proof of claim: We may write $ {\mathcal P}K$ as the disjoint union of $ {\mathcal I}K$ and $ {\mathcal F}K$. By the result of the previous problem, we have $ {\rm card}{\mathcal F}A = \kappa$. Letting $ \lambda := {\rm card}{\mathcal I}K$, We compute

$\displaystyle 2^\kappa$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle {\rm card}{\mathcal P}K$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle {\rm card}({\mathcal F}K \cup {\mathcal I}K)$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle {\rm card}({\mathcal F}K) + {\rm card}({\mathcal I}K)$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \kappa + \lambda$    by Problem 6   
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \max \{ \kappa, \lambda \}$    by the absorption law   
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \lambda$    as $\displaystyle \kappa < 2^\kappa$  

$ \maltese$

By Euclid's theorem, the set $ P$ of prime numbers is a countably infinite set. Hence, the set $ {\mathcal I}P$ of infinite sets of primes has cardinality $ 2^{\aleph_0}$.

For each $ X \in {\mathcal I}P$ define $ A_X := \{ \prod_{p \leq n, p \in X} p \ \vert \ n \in \omega \} \subseteq \omega \}$. This association defined a function $ F: {\mathcal I}P \to {\mathcal P}\omega$. Let $ {\mathcal A}:= {\rm rng}F$.

Note that for any $ X \in {\mathcal I}P$ the set $ A_X$ is infinite as $ X$ is infinite so that there are elements of $ A_X$ with arbitrarily many prime divisors.

If $ X \neq Y$ are two distinct elements of $ {\mathcal I}P$, then there is some prime which belongs to one set but not the other. Without loss of generality, we may assume $ p \in X \setminus Y$. Let $ A_X' := \{ \prod_{\ell \leq n, \ell \in X} \ell \ \vert \ n < p \}$ and $ A_X'' := A_X \setminus A_X'$. Note that if $ y \in A_Y$, then $ p$ does not divide $ y$ while $ p$ divides every element of $ A_X''$. Thus, $ A_X \cap A_Y$ is contained in $ A_X' \cap A_Y \subseteq A_X' \subseteq \{ m \in \omega : m < p! \}$ which is a finite set. Hence, $ A_X \cap A_Y$ is finite. As $ A_X$ is infinite, this implies in particular that $ A_X \neq A_Y$. Thus, the map $ F:{\mathcal I}P \to {\mathcal A}$ is a bijection so that $ {\mathcal A}$ has cardinality $ 2^{\aleph_0}$ and is almost disjoint. $ \qedsymbol$


8 Show that for any infinite cardinal $ \kappa$, we have $ \kappa! = 2^\kappa$.

Proof. Let $ K$ be any set with $ {\rm card}K = \kappa$. Let $ {\rm Sym}(K) := \{ \sigma: K \to K \vert \sigma$    a bijection $ \}$. Then by definition, we have $ \kappa ! = {\rm card}{\rm Sym}(K)$.

As every permutation is a function from $ K$ to $ K$ (and in particular a relation with field $ K$), we have $ {\rm Sym}(K) \subseteq {\mathcal P}(K \times K)$ so that $ \kappa! \leq 2^{\kappa \cdot \kappa} = 2^\kappa$.

For the other inequality, define a function $ F: {\rm Sym}(K) \to {\mathcal P}K$ by $ \sigma \mapsto \{ x \in K \vert \sigma(x) = x \}$. Let $ A := {\rm rng}F$. To compute the cardinality of $ A$ we need a claim.

Claim: Let $ X$ be any set with $ {\rm card}X \geq 2$. Then there is a permutation $ \pi:X \to X$ having no fixed points.

Proof of claim: If $ X$ is finite, then $ X \approx n$ for some $ n \in \omega$ with $ n > 2$. Let $ f:n \to X$ be a bijection. Define $ \sigma:n \to n$ by $ \sigma(i) = i^+$ if $ i < n-1$ and $ \sigma(n-1) = 0$. Define $ \pi:X \to X$ by $ \pi = f \circ \pi \circ f^{-1}$.

If $ X$ is infinite of cardinality $ \lambda$, then as $ \lambda = \lambda \times \lambda$, we can find a bijection $ g:X \to X \times 2$. Define $ \sigma: X \times 2 \to X \times 2$ by $ \langle x, i \rangle \to \langle x, 1 - i \rangle$. Let $ \pi := g^{-1} \circ \sigma \circ g$. $ \maltese$

From the claim it follows that $ B = \{ X \in {\mathcal P}K \ \vert \ {\rm card}(K \setminus X) \neq 1 \}$. For if $ X = K$, then $ X = F({\rm id}_K)$ and if $ K \setminus X =: Y$ has more than one element, then we can find (by the claim) a permutation $ \pi:Y \to Y$ having no fixed points so that if $ \sigma = \pi \cup {\rm id}_X$ we have $ F(\sigma) = X$. Finally, if $ K \setminus X = \{ a \}$ is a singleton, then $ X$ cannot be in the image of $ F$ as any permutation which fixes $ X$ must fix its complement setwise, and in the case of a singleton, being fixed setwise is the same as being fixed pointwise.

There is an obvious bijection between $ K$ and the set of subsets of $ K$ whose complements are singletons given by $ a \mapsto K \setminus \{ a \}$. Hence, $ \vert{\mathcal P}K \setminus B\vert = \kappa$. As in the proof the claim in problem 7, we conclude that $ \vert B\vert = 2^\kappa$. As $ F:{\rm Sym}(K) \to B$ is surjective, we conclude that $ \kappa ! \geq 2^\kappa$.

Combining this with the other inequality, we conclude that $ \kappa! = 2^\kappa$. $ \qedsymbol$




next up previous
Next: About this document ...
Thomas Scanlon 2003-04-09