arrow from the www to
the home page of this site
Sachs: Radiation Biology Home
arrow toward the right pointing to
the next lower page in a hierarchy
Research
arrow toward the right pointing to
the next lower page in a hierarchy
Papers 01-02
arrow toward the right pointing to
the next lower page in a hierarchy
arrow pointing downward to
the information on this pageInstabilityarrow pointing downward to
the information on this page
 

International Journal of Radiation Biology , 2002. In press

Computer analysis of mFISH chromosome aberration data

uncovers an excess of very complicated metaphases

Mariel Vázquez*, Karin M. Greulich-Bodea,b, Javier Arsuaga*, Michael N. Cornforthd, Martina Brücknera, Rainer K. Sachs*, Lynn Hlatkyc, Michael Mollsa and Philip Hahnfeldtc

*Department of Mathematics, MC3840, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

aDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Germany

bDepartment of Skin Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany

cDFCI, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115

dDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0656

Correspondence to: Mariel Vázquez,

UC Berkeley, Mathematics Department, Berkeley, CA 94720-3840, USA.

Telephone: 510-642-2091; Fax: 510-642-8204; e-mail: mariel@math.berkeley.edu

 

 

 

Abstract

Purpose. To analyze spectra of chromosome aberrations induced in vitro by low LET radiation, in order to characterize radiation damage mechanisms quantitatively.

Methods. Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) allows the simultaneous identification of each homologous chromosome pair by its own color. mFISH data, specifying number distributions for color junctions in metaphases of human peripheral blood lymphocytes 72 hours after exposure in vitro to a 3 Gy g -ray dose, were combined with similar, previously published results. Monte Carlo computer implementations of radiobiological models for chromosome aberration production guided quantitative analyses, which took into account distribution of cells among different metaphases and lethal effects or preferential elimination of some aberrations at cell division.

Results and Conclusions. Standard models of DNA damage induction/repair/misrepair explain the main trends of the data as regards the fraction of metaphases having a particular number of colors involved in color junctions. However, all standard models systematically under-predict the observed fraction of metaphases where a large number of different chromosomes participate in aberrations. An early appearance of chromosomal instability could explain most of the discrepancies.

Back to top of page