P.10, display (30) and preceding sentence: Symmetry in the subscripts does not, as I claimed, show that d( p, f(yi)) = d( p, f(y0)), etc.. Rather, it shows that in bounding d( p, f(yi)), etc., we can without loss of generality assume i = 0.
P.17: In the statement of Corollary 26, we must assume not only that D(\nu) = \mu, but that \nu has the same positive and negative supports as \mu, and that \Gamma(\nu) is cycle-free. (The words "By Proposition 24" can then be dropped from the proof.)
P.10: In the lines following display (25), "maximize" should in both places be "minimize", and "infimum" should be "supremum". The line after display (26) should be expanded to: "Writing ex , ey , ez respectively for the functions on X given by the integral in (16) for these three measures \mu, we find that". Then, in display (27), change all 9 instances of \mu to e; and likewise, in the paragraph between (28) and (29), change all 5 instances of \mu to e. (But no change needed in the paragraph between (27) and (28).)
Statement of Lemma 7: The reference to V and V' in the first sentence can be dropped: They never appear after that!
In the 5th line before Question 23, Sn should be Sn.
In the 3rd line after the proof of Propositon 24, after "is achieved" add "and that the other parameters mentioned above can then be minimized;".
Article Addenda Final preprint: tex dvi pdf ps. Back to publications-list.