MPHD: Math, Productivity, Happiness & Decision-making

This page will relocate to http://www.acritch.com/mphd/ after I graduate.


The cutest bunny Organizers: Andrew Critch and Nisan Stiennon
Time: Wednesdays, 5:00 - 6:00pm
Location: 740 Evans Hall
Contact / join the mailing list: critch at math dot berkeley dot edu

On every second week, we go out for dinner after the seminar.
                    

about the seminar | schedule and abstracts | how it started | usual format

[this page is being updated regularly]

About the Seminar

Most of us want to be happier, get things done, help other people, have a sense of purpose, and achieve other such deeply human goals. In this seminar, we hope to take advantage of our analytic minds — our comparative advantage as mathematical thinkers — to address these goals. Some of our guiding principles are:

Schedule and Abstracts

Date Dinner Kick-off Speaker Department Topic announcement Links / materials
Jan 18 No Andrew Critch UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
Overview / organizational meeting  
Jan 25 Yes Nisan Stiennon Stanford,
Mathematics
Formulating beliefs and values  
Feb 1 No Andrew Dudzik UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
Getting Things Done (with less stress) - Wikipedia article on GTD
- Software: Remember the Milk, for web and mobiles
- Software: Evernote, for web, PC, Mac, and mobiles
Feb 8 Yes Andrew Critch UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
Directed graphical causal models for our personal lives - Paper: Easterday et al (2009) Constructing causal diagrams to learn delibration
- Website: Matthew Easterday's research
- Handout: Using causal graphs and thinking hats
- Worksheets: Be creative, Be curious, Be skeptical, and Be strategic
Feb 15 No Nick Hay UC Berkeley,
Computer Science
Training work-focus with the Pomodoro Technique (and GTD update) - Wikipedia article on the Pomodoro Technique
- Software: Pomodroido, for Android
Feb 22 Yes Nisan Stiennon Stanford,
Mathematics
Confidence calibration:
Make probabilities work for you
- Worksheets: Confidence calibration
Feb 29 No Andrew Critch UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
Coordinatizing emotion-space (and feeling it) - Wikipedia article on Affective neuroscience
- Worksheets: Emotional awareness
Mar 7 Yes Anna Salamon SIAI Stop rationalizing:
The what fooling yourself feels like game
- Paper: Taber, Lodge (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs
- Worksheets: Types of rationalization and how they feel
Mar 14 No Kaushik Krishnan UC Berkeley,
Economics
Spaced repetition learning and software - Wikipedia article on spaced repetition learning
- Software: Mnemosyne
- Software: Anki
Mar 21 Yes Andrew Critch UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
How and when to change beliefs:
Internalizing Bayesian updating
- Wikipedia article on Bayes' Rule
- An Intuitive (and Short) Explanation of Bayes' Theorem
- Worksheet: the Really Getting Bayes game
Mar 28     No Seminar; Spring Break  
Apr 4 Yes Joseph Williams UC Berkeley,
Psychology
Strategies for behavior change  
Apr 11 No Elliott Collins UC Berkeley,
A&R Econonomics
Calibrating shyness/embarrassment with
Rejection Therapy
 
Apr 18 Yes Anna Salamon SIAI Value of information and Fermi estimations in daily life  
Yes Apr 25 Andrew Critch UC Berkeley,
Mathematics
The future of human reasoning  

How did this get started?

Last year, Nisan and I attended a week-long workshop on "Rationality and Social Effectiveness" with 24 other people, mostly grad students and tech professionals, who all seemed to really like it. Now we want to recreate something similar in a seminar format, and the first step to getting good at something is to practice it once, so here we go!

Usual format

Our default format is designed to give the audience time to optimize and filter which questions/issues get discussed with the room as a whole, and to ensure everyone experiences some amount of personally relevant conversation.

10-15 mins: kick-off A speaker presents a quick topic introduction, setting an intuitive focal point for the rest of the seminar. To keep this part short, audience members ask few or no questions, and instead jot down self-reminders of questions and thoughts they want to pursue later.
0-5 mins: audience contributions The audience can contribute quick facts or comments they think will be concrete and useful for the whole room, but not yet questions. Please contribute experience and expert knowledge here!
5-10 mins: small group
discussions
Small groups form, and people with relevant experience or knowledge are asked to distribute among the groups. Participants ask each other their stored questions from the kick-off, and try to clarify things for each other. In this way, people intuitively settle on what their most important remaining ideas and questions are. Some ideas to start conversation:
  • Questions, reservations, or criticisms
  • Related personal experiences
  • How we can use the kick-off ideas in our own lives
  • How we can test the kick-off ideas in our own lives
10-15 mins: unified Q&A discussion
The room again engages in a single conversation, much like the "any questions" part of other seminars, but with a moderator summarizing the discussion on the board as it progresses, both as a record and a subtle social signal to stay on topic. Audience members should feel free to answer each other's questions instead of channeling all communication through the speaker when it seems inefficient to do so. The kick-off speaker is not expected to help moderate the conversation, but should feel welcome to.

Sometimes, in place of the small group conversations, there will be specific exercises to stimulate (hopefully) interesting thoughts, and/or to intuitively clarify the "spirit" of that day's topic.