Barry Mazur
Let E be an elliptic curve over Q of conductor N contained, as
sub-abelian variety, in J_0(N), the jacobian of the modular curve X_0(N).
Almost two years ago I gave a lecture in this seminar about trying to
"visualize" some of the elements of the Shafarevich-Tate group of such an
elliptic curve E, as curves of genus 1 (defined over Q) contained in the
algebraic variety J_0(N). The surprise of computations for squarefree N and
odd Sha made by Adam Logan, using data of Cremona, is that so many elements
of Sha can be seen this way, and more specifically can be found in abelian
surfaces A contained in J_0(N), where A is isogenous to a product E x F
(with F another elliptic curve which satisfies a congruence with E, and
which has Mordell-Weil rank > 1). As Logan showed, 2849 is the first
squarefree conductor N for which there is an elliptic curve in J_0(N) whose
(odd) Sha cannot be visualized in this way. Subsequently, Cremona and I
wrote a paper extending the computations to include all conductors,
squarefree or not, up to 5500, and studying even Sha as well. For this
extended range, one still has very few cases where Sha is not visualizable
in the way I described. This deserves explanation! In this lecture I will
prove that over any number field K any element of order three in any
elliptic curve E over K can be represented by a curve of genus 1 (defined
over K) in an abelian surface A which is isogenous to E x F (all, of
course, over K). This is hardly sufficient to explain the surprising data
that has been gathered because the result to be proved gives NO information
about the conductor of A, but, at least, it is something...
Robert F. Coleman
Last modified: Sun Nov 8 11:05:57 PST